The
Lok Sabha debate on black money was a waste of time. The Finance
Minister kept repeating himself, if the names of the account holders
were to be disclosed in violation of the treaty, no country would
share any information and if there were any evaders in the list they
would get be free.
Waste
of time because every political party starting with the Congress,
every few minutes one member would rise say the same thing, the
explanation was not satisfactory so we are walking out. Really, the
Congress was at the helm of affairs when this issue surfaced. Could
they not throw light on the issue which they want us to believe the
Government is hiding and is a list of just 427 names worth walking
out for.
Assume
all 427 are guilty, will penalising them or putting them in jail
going to rid the country of this menace. Their major point was that
the BJP promised results in 100 days. The fact that black money
abounds and most likely given the situation in Goa, most of it will
be in the hands of ruling politicians. Ofcourse, you can hear them
say in one voice, if proved we will resign. In short the debate in
parliament to me was an eye wash.
While
the BJP has a point, disclosing the names will not serve any long
term purpose, on the other hand surely they can go after some of the
black money still in the country. Or can that happen only after the
427 names are cleared.
Black
money is of two types in my opinion. One which is unaccounted after a
legitimate business transaction. Quite a few businessmen generate
cash income which is taxable but they prefer to avoid paying income
tax, so they would have broken the law. This should not be a
priority. Given the increasing level of IT usage, KYC norms,
requirements of PAN no etc, slowly but surely the net is widening to
encompass such evaders. Increasing consumerism is pushing the cash
out. Today people who have it want to flaunt it.
The
more serious and dangerous black money is generated by corruption.
This is what can be termed as anti national and deserving of the
quick and harsh punishment in say Singapore. We do want to be a
tiger economy like Singapore, but without the hard rules. The Mumbai
bomb blasts showed how a few corrupt officials allowed death to pass
by them for a few rupees, assuming it was just another consignment of
drugs or gold, not realising it was RDX.
We
have corrupt politicians who have no qualms about selling the
countries wealth just so that their nests are feathered. Watching
them we have our bureaucrats who also guide and act as enablers to
help the politicians. Today, they do not need businessmen,
politicians have become businessmen, going by the number of
crorepatis in Parliament. The few who oppose the politicians
nefarious designs are shunted around a la Kiran Bedi.
We
can surely not expect politicians to address this issue because that
is like asking fish t o dry the pond. They will do anything for votes
and another politician can be useful especially if he has corrupt
baggage. The general defense is there is no proof, or if implicated
the charges are assumed to be politically motivated.
In
Goa, the BJP rose to power and there are great expectations of
change. Three years on that expectation is still waiting to be
fulfilled. There were a number of scams, yet today not one has seen
the light of day. To be fair, one officer in GIDC was terminated.
What about the others, did he act alone? There is a clear cut case
against the previous Chairman of GIDC, yet no case is registered.
More like dangling the sword has more value than striking. The same
situation exists in the mining cases, now the figure is down to 3000
crores, great can we see some action, surely it did not happen
without political support. This refusal to act against the
politicians is a national malaise. The Jayalatha case was significant
because it has bucked the trend. If every prosecutor or investigating
agency did their job as well as the people involved in the Jaylaltha
case, we would see more convictions. Once we have more convictions we
will see a reduction in corruption, if not it is a gamble with no
down side.
A
government employee facing a disproportionate assets case, explained
his source of income as fees for performing religious services.
Either he has to charge a huge amount per session or he has to be
doing it full time. Both are not feasible, so obviously it is income
from another source. Can the investigator not question those who are
reported to have paid the fees and conclude if the source is genuine
or not. However this is the trend, politicians show income from
farms, fishing trawlers and hotels. Yet full time farmers commit
suicide and trawler owners regularly ask for governmental assistance
in the form of diesel subsidy and non politician hotels never have
100% occupancy.
This
illegal money turned into legal money is then used to invest in other
legitimate business. It is literally cocking a snoop at the anti
money laundering act and laughing all the way to the bank.
PM,
Modi is doing away with archaic laws, one he must look at seriously
is the law that makes paying a bribe a crime. It should be repealed
and only receiving a bribe should be a crime. Will he have the
political will to do it? That would make a difference in the fight
against black money not a debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment