The recent controversy created by the
meeting of Catholic MLA's with the Church representatives got me
thinking. The Church in Goa is powerful. Is it not time they used
that power responsibly? A few years ago the Archbishop at his annual
Christmas meeting with all MLA's was blunt enough to call a spade a
spade and asked the MLA's to be true to their calling. That to my
mind was responsible.
However it was never followed up.
Instead, rather than take up these matters through the proper
channels, a totally irresponsible meeting was called for. What would
we have said if a similar exercise was done and only non catholic
MLA's were called to a meeting to push some proposal. Would we not
have shouted “it is an attempt to finish Catholics” ?
Where was the Diocesan Education
society (DES) all these months, why was nothing brought up first in
writing with the education department and subsequently discussed in a
public forum. The problem with working behind the scene is that the
decision can go either way, in this case we see finally the decision
was not in DSE's favour so they went public. Again. if the meeting
was called for by the Archbishop's secretary, should not the
Archbishop have been present or was his office used? Would the MLA's
have responded if it was the DSE office that called the meeting? The
cause is good but the method used to address the injustice is not.
The aversion to competition is not just with the taxi trade, it is
also a malaise that runs deep in the education sector since many of
the institutions are run by the politicians themselves. They make the
rules and divert funds and grants to their institutions. The only way
is to approach the courts and get these “favourable to some”
orders struck down. Do not expect so called catholic MLA's to assist
because, they belong to the same team. A cozy club of “you scratch
my back I scratch yours”.
If the DSE wants efficiency, are they
efficient? Has any feedback from stake holders been taken on their
functioning, is it up to the mark. The Catholic Bishop's Conference
of India (CBCI) has infact come out with a Catholic Education policy,
till date there is no sign of its implementation. This policy was to
improve the quality of education imparted in DSE run schools. Just
pushing for numbers without quality is one issue, not being able to
follow directives of the policy making body is another. Possibly a
more effective and efficient leadership would not have called for
such a meeting.
Normally such a situation should have
seen heads roll, but we have got used to burying our heads in the
sand, ostrich like and believing everything is OK, a la Sushma
affair. I hope there is some learning in hindsight, where the church
leadership will accept there error in judgment and take corrective
steps.
Moving on, the church had issued an
advisory to its flock to support “secular” candidates during the
last general election. The fact that in the Assembly election held
three years ago, the Church advisory was to vote for “non corrupt”
candidates. It was heartening to note that the Church is not only
getting involved but also asking the faithful to get involved in
public life. Now, because of these two advisories, even though they
were elections apart, the faithful were in a dilemma?
The Congress who faced a rout in the
assembly elections because there was no doubt about its corrupt
credentials, began jumping with joy. They have read the advisory to
mean corruption is OK, communalism is a bigger danger. One would have
imagined that the powers that be in the Congress party would come out
strongly and said, “we respect the people's opposition to
corruption, we will fight against it”. Instead they wanted us to
believe that they are going to save us from so called fascist’s and
therefore the people of Goa / India should allow them a free hand to
be corrupt. Dr. Manmohan Singh was himself not known to be corrupt
but he turned a blind eye when his colleagues dipped their hand in
the till. Despite the advisory the so called secular candidates were
routed. This shows that people are thinking and followed the advisory
of the Church, they voted for a secular candidates who they felt
would not only share their opposition to corruption but would ensure
that India is free from fascists everyday and not just election time.
Ofcourse, the reality as it unfolds today is different, three years
down the line and our new assembly has not been able to find and nail
even one corrupt act.
So is it not time the Church sees the
writing on the wall and starts living the principles of the
religion. Come out strongly against corruption and corrupt, and not
hob knob with them. Issue a directive to churches to not allow
donations to be made public. This is where ill gotten gain is used to
fund church activities and also give legitimacy to the donor. If we
have faith then the Church should not prop corrupt individuals in the
hope that they will be saviours if the fathom fascists attack. We
must now walk the talk. We must be an example to others. We have not
in the past, let us start now.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment